Cloning And Immortality

To some, cloning seems like one of our best hopes for immortality. The ability to create new copies of ourselves, to start over in a fresh body.

But would it really be that simple?

Even if we had the technology to create perfect human clones, and to transfer our memories into them, cloning for immortality stumbles over the very same obstacle as teleportation.

Your Clone Is Not You

Imagine you’ve been cloned. You’re standing in line, waiting for your memories to be uploaded to a younger version of yourself, something grown in a lab and rapidly aged to, say, around 20 years old.

A computer scans the current composition of your brain, replicating every memory, every feeling, everything that makes you you. It then copies this information into the brain of your new clone, and suddenly there’s a younger-looking version of yourself, with all of your memories, staring right back at you.

And, yet, you’re not feeling that much better for it.

Because the clone — it looks like you, talks like you, thinks like you.

But it’s not you.

From that moment onward, you and your clone will have two completely independent experiences. This includes how you both develop as humans, and the myriad paths your genetic codes will take as you live out your lives. You’re still going to experience death, even if your clone lives on happily until the next (let’s call it a) “clone cycle.”

And worst case scenario? The original you is discarded as soon as the clone is ready and uploaded.

This is no escape. This is not immortality.

Just watch The 6th Day and you’ll see this philosophical quandary in action.

But Is It Still Worth It?

A row of LEGO clone troopers from Star Wars
Image: Flickr/Jeremy Keith via CC by 2.0

I do get the sense that, in the future, perfect copies of humans — both physically and mentally, memories and all — may be possible.

I’m not, however, convinced that this will preserve the original human being copied. It may, in some way, benefit society — perhaps cloning geniuses like Einstein and Hawking to keep them around — but we shouldn’t put ourselves under the illusion that, by doing so, we’d as individuals live forever.

Of course, it is, like I said, philosophical. And hypothetical.

There’s actually an ongoing┬ádebate about the nature of cloning for immortality. The above is just my opinion on the outcome, and many people would disagree with me. Some believe consciousness would transfer, and others simply question whether or not it even matters.

Is there value in having some form of yourself live on beyond death, to leave something behind even though you’re no longer here to experience it? Many people feel this way about their children, so why not identical clones of themselves?

What would live forever would not be you, per se, but your essence. Your will. The information you posses. Something.

If we ever gained the ability to transfer (read: copy) memories and intelligence into clones or robot avatars, what it means to be human would fundamentally change. It wouldn’t be physical bodies or even the idea of souls, but rather the existence of ideas and thoughts and thinking patterns (and I’m somewhat reminded of Revelation Space by Alastair Reynolds in this regard).

The biggest problem? Even if we do find a way to perfectly transfer consciousness, whether into a clone or a robot or a simulation, there’s no outrunning the end. Not really.

But we will try.


Rob Schwarz

Rob Schwarz is a writer, blogger, and part-time peddler of mysterious tales. Editor-in-chief of Stranger Dimensions.


    1. I’d be comfortable with that if it worked, yeah. I just keep running into the whole “memory transfer” debate while browsing online and thought it was interesting.

      The problem, however, is that our brains also age, albeit slower than the rest of us. Cognition deteriorates, and disorders like Alzheimer’s would completely erase the entire point of a new clone body. Recent studies have shown that neuron cells may be able to regenerate, though, so maybe we can fix that.

      Then again, if we ever get to the point where such cloning/memory technology is available, you’d think we’d also have answers for the aging problem. Maybe.

      In the end, we might not need clones or robot bodies at all. Just take a pill and live forever!

      Would you want to?

      1. What if we made the memory transfer an experience? As each memory and feeling is transferred, we can make the whole process of the switch a vivid memory, and as the information is transferred, the original is destroyed. After this, you would be looking back at your brain dead body.

        To me I see no limitations with this. Once you have that information, you can store it digitally. As long as you don’t break the perpetuity of a single conscious mind, there are infinite possibilities with this. You could essentially even become someone else, or at least have their memories, and still be “you.”

    2. Yes this is what I think.. your brain can be transferred and the woulndt be any cellular rejection .. your brain holds not only your thought but also your soul.. You brain usually starts deteriorating when your bday gets old and it can’t feed and care for the brain that same way your younger body does.. but if you close your body wait 15 years to grow and then just transfer you cloud live for ever

  1. So we will be able to create clones of ourselves and inject our memories into the clone and literally create copies of ourselves.. and accelerate their age to 20 years old…

    but we won’t be able to reverse aging? If we can accelerate the age of a clone in a lab to be a 20 year old adult why can’t we reverse aging so that an 80 year old has their 20 year old body again? Totally eliminating the need to create a young clone of ourselves.

  2. Why doesn’t anyone ever talk about the clone that was developed. Does it have its own soul? Just like a twin. And if so you take out the clones memories so you can put part of your brain into there’s? This is wrong on so many levels.