NOAA Explains Why We Can’t Nuke Tropical Cyclones

Posted by on December 18, 2012
Nuking Cyclones

Earlier this year, NOAA shocked the world when they announced that mermaids — yes, mermaidsprobably aren’t real.

Well, unfortunately, they’ve once again decided to crush the hopes and dreams of those of us who sometimes like to think outside the box. Like, way outside the box.

On their Tropical Cyclone Modification And Myths page, there’s a brief section explaining why, exactly, we shouldn’t use nuclear weapons to destroy tropical cyclones:

“During each hurricane season, there always appear suggestions that one should simply use nuclear weapons to try and destroy the storms. Apart from the fact that this might not even alter the storm, this approach neglects the problem that the released radioactive fallout would fairly quickly move with the tradewinds to affect land areas and cause devastating environmental problems. Needless to say, this is not a good idea.”

The article goes on to give a fairly thorough explanation of the science behind why a nuclear bomb wouldn’t effectively stop a cyclone. And then there’s this little bit of trivia:

“The heat release [of a fully developed hurricane] is equivalent to a 10-megaton nuclear bomb exploding every 20 minutes.”

Good to know.

The point is this, folks: You can’t just shove a tropical storm to the side by exploding it with a nuke, no matter how much we may want to try.

Check it out: Why don’t we try to destroy tropical cyclones by nuking them?



Like this article? Subscribe to the Stranger Dimensions mailing list to receive updates whenever a new post is added. It's free, and you can unsubscribe at any time.
Post by Rob Schwarz

Rob Schwarz is a writer, blogger, and part-time peddler of mysterious tales. He manages Stranger Dimensions in between changing aquarium filters and reading bad novels about mermaids.